In a country where government ministers often make noise only to fold and fall silent under the weight of political interests, Minister Adel Nassar is proving to be a rare exception. Unlike his predecessors who talked reform but bent to the will of political bosses, Nassar is quietly reshaping one of Lebanon’s most paralyzed institutions: the Ministry of Justice. Long mired in political interference and sectarian power plays, the ministry is now witnessing an unprecedented transformation; one driven by Nassar’s calm resolve and clear reformist vision.
At the heart of his mission is a straightforward but revolutionary idea: restoring faith in Lebanon’s justice system by making it independent, functional, and fair. For years, the judiciary has been seen less as a pillar of democracy and more as a venue for settling political scores. Nassar wants to change that. He envisions a justice system that protects rights rather than serving agendas; a judiciary that earns the trust of citizens, not their suspicion.
What makes Nassar stand out isn’t just his commitment to structural reforms inside the ministry, but also his dogged insistence on insulating the judiciary from political interference. Nowhere is this more evident than in his push to finalize judicial appointments, a critical issue that had been stalled during President Michel Aoun’s term. Files that once collected dust in the presidential palace have now moved to the top of Nassar’s agenda. His approach is as bold as it is principled: place the right person in the right position based on merit, not political affiliation or sectarian balance. In Nassar’s view, true judicial autonomy begins with an independent, merit-based appointments process.
According to well-informed sources within the Justice Ministry, Nassar handles Lebanon’s most sensitive legal files with persistence and patience. He has made it clear that no amount of political pressure will sway his decisions. For him, two criteria matter: competence and integrity. In doing so, he charts a markedly different course from previous administrations, many of which deliberately blocked reform, especially when it came to passing the long-delayed law on judicial independence, which remains shelved in Parliament.
Perhaps the clearest sign of change under Nassar came with the resumption of Judge Tarek Bitar's investigation into the Beirut port blast. Lebanese families have waited in agony for justice after the catastrophic 2020 explosion. Nassar played a central role in bringing this case back on track, benefiting from a less oppressive political climate than before. The forces that once threatened to “remove” the lead investigator and derail the probe no longer wield the same influence or capacity to do so.
Bitar’s return has rekindled hope that justice may finally be served in what remains one of the most devastating crimes in Lebanon’s modern history. It’s also a signal that Nassar is serious about entrenching judicial independence and ending the political stranglehold on the judiciary. For him, judicial independence is not a talking point; it's the cornerstone of the rule of law, the foundation of the principle of separation of powers, and the bulwark protecting institutions from political meddling.
Observers say the recent momentum in judicial reform is no accident. It reflects a broader effort to clean up a sector long tarnished by corruption, shady deals, and systemic waste. There is a growing sense that the days of complicity and cover-up may be over, and that a new chapter in the history of Lebanese justice is being written.
Still, not everyone is pleased. Some of those who once benefited from a politicized, pliable judiciary are now openly frustrated. For many, the judiciary that Nassar is working to liberate was merely a selective tool, shaped more by political leverage than by law or conscience.
Despite the lack of media fanfare and flashy press conferences, ministry sources say real progress is being made quietly, steadily, and deliberately. This matters deeply to all Lebanese, especially young people, who have grown weary of hollow promises and long to see real, tangible accomplishments within public institutions.
The coming weeks will reveal whether these reforms can withstand the storms of politics or whether the signs of change will be stifled, as in past experiences. One thing is certain: Adel Nassar is not waging a fleeting political venture. He is engaged in a high-stakes, deeply consequential battle to build a justice system that answers to no one but the law itself.
This is an English adaptation of an Arabic article by Chady Hilani.