Political Uproar Grows as Berri Monopolizes Ceasefire Negotiations Unconstitutionally

Voices opposing the delegation of Lebanon’s negotiation authority to figures outside constitutional institutions have grown louder in recent weeks, particularly concerning matters that deeply impact the nation's future. At the center of the controversy is Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who has been leading negotiations with U.S. envoy Amos Hochstein to broker a ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel. 

Several political parties have issued statements denouncing what they describe as a violation of Lebanon’s sovereignty and arguing that negotiations led exclusively by Berri on behalf of Hezbollah bypass the constitutional authority of the Lebanese state. These groups warned that the monopolization of negotiation authority has undermined Lebanon’s sovereignty, disrupted national partnership, entrenched external dominance over Lebanese decision-making, and dragged the country into destructive wars. They called for an immediate end to this monopolistic approach and demanded that Speaker Berri convene a general parliamentary session to inform MPs about the proposed settlement and allow its discussion.

Speaking to the Central News Agency, legal and constitutional expert Said Malek affirmed that Article 52 of the Lebanese Constitution stipulates that the President of the Republic, in agreement with the Prime Minister, holds the exclusive authority to negotiate on behalf of the state. In the absence of a president, this authority is transferred to the Council of Ministers as a whole, under Article 62.

"Speaker Berri’s unilateral role in these negotiations is unconstitutional and oversteps his powers. The Prime Minister should reject any agreement negotiated in this manner and refuse to present it to the Council of Ministers without proper procedural adherence," Malek noted.

According to Malek, constitutional procedure requires that any agreement must first be finalized through negotiations conducted by the government. Following this, the agreement must be submitted to Parliament for debate and ratified after being approved by a two-thirds majority.